logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.11.23 2017나61945
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The parties' assertion

A. On November 14, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendants, a neighboring resident of an apartment, kidddddddd the couple fighting, told the Defendants that they would be frighten outside the front door of the house, and entered his house. Accordingly, the Defendants found the Plaintiff’s eye in their house, and went through the body of the Defendants, i.e., e., the Plaintiff’s eye and fright the head.

As a result, the plaintiff suffered injuries such as diversified typrym typoids, salt, etc. in need of treatment for about three weeks.

Therefore, the Defendants are jointly and severally obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the total sum of KRW 6,514,826,00,00,000,00 for property damages, such as the amount of damages caused by tort, lost income, medical expenses, and cost of household production

B. The Defendants asserted that the Defendants did not jointly appear when they were the Plaintiff, and rather, they could not respond to the Plaintiff’s claim in this case, since they were under the influence of alcohol and requested the Defendants to be imprisoned, such as taking a large amount of sound before the Defendant’s office flusium, and thus, the Defendants requested the Defendants to be imprisoned.

2. Each statement submitted by the Plaintiff 1 to 9 alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the Defendants jointly committed the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this. Thus, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit without need to further examine.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed as all of the grounds for appeal. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as all of the grounds for appeal. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow