A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of four years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[F]

1. For the purpose of exercising on August 19, 197, the Defendant: (a) stated that the Defendant is “H” serial number of the Promissory Notes issued by G; (b) “H on November 18, 1997”; (c) the payment date; (d) Kim Jong-si; and (e) the amount of the Promissory Notes as “daily KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00,000,

F Official sealed the name of F.

As a result, the Defendant forged an endorsement in the name of F, which is a statement on the rights and obligations of promissory notes, which is securities.

2. On August 19, 197, the Defendant, at the same location of the Ma-dong branch of the bank located in the North Korea-U.S., before the North Korea-U.S. on August 19, 1997, claimed a discount on the bill to K in charge of the bank who knew of the forgery, and exercised the promissory note, which forged the endorsement as described in paragraph 1, as if it were genuine.

[L]

1. Fraud;

A. The Defendant, on June 14, 1997, lent money to the Defendant at the N office of the company N office located in the Dasan-si, Dasan-si, a limited liability company M, and requested that the Defendant lend money to the Defendant, the Defendant would lend a promissory note and the check to the Defendant.

On the other hand, it concluded that P, a creditor of the directors of the company with limited liability, which is run by the NN and the establishment of a mortgage of KRW 150,000,000,000, and that blank promissory notes will change to P to the high seas. The amount of the establishment of a mortgage and the amount of a blank promissory note will be liable for the payment of the

However, at the time of fact, the amount of a promissory note and a check which the Defendant had operated as a limited liability companyO or a limited liability company N did not settle has reached approximately KRW 3 billion, and the Defendant bears the obligation equivalent to KRW 500 million. As such, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to assume the above amount of a collateral security and the face value of a blank promissory note.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and his deceivings the victim, the victim.