logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2018.06.01 2017가단37597
청구이의
Text

1. Compulsory execution by the Defendant’s notary public against the Plaintiff on January 12, 2017, No. 2017, No. 222.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff lived with D from around 2014 to July 2017.

B. On January 1, 2017, D was investigated into a fraudulent case against the Defendant as of January 1, 2017, D provided a notarial deed to the effect that it would recognize a compulsory execution against the Plaintiff’s real estate and received a revocation of the complaint from the Defendant. On January 12, 2017, at the notary public C office, the Defendant asserted that D was granted a legitimate power to prepare the instant notarial deed from the Plaintiff, while the evidence submitted by the Defendant alone is insufficient to reverse the recognition.

No. 22 of the 2017 Deed No. 201, No. 2017 No. 2011, Jan. 11, 2017, a notary public prepared a notarial deed (hereinafter referred to as “notarial deed of this case”) to the effect that the said notary public, who is aware of the fact, presented the power of attorney and a certificate of personal seal impression in the name of the plaintiff, and presented the notarial deed, and entrusted the said notary public with the preparation of a notarial deed. The said notary public, who is aware of the fact, confirmed that he/she was liable to the defendant on January 11, 2017, and that he/she is not dissatisfied with compulsory execution.

D was prosecuted for the above facts constituting an offense in this Court. This Court rendered a judgment of conviction on January 24, 2018, and this Court appealed as the Changwon District Court 2018No320, but the above appellate court dismissed D’s appeal on April 25, 2018. D’s appeal to the Supreme Court is currently pending in the final appeal as of April 25, 2018. 【Ground for recognition’s appeal to the Supreme Court. 【Ground for recognition’s appeal to the Supreme Court’s Supreme Court’s Supreme Court’s final appeal is without dispute, Party A’s entries in subparagraphs 1 through 5, and the purport

2. The indication of the recognition of execution that the judgment on the cause of the claim may have executory power as a title of debt is an act of litigation against a notary public, so a notarial deed is authentic upon the commission of an unauthorized representative.

arrow