A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence Nos. 4 and 5 shall be confiscated.

10,000 won from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

In July 2017, the Defendant, even if not a narcotics handler, administered a philophone by inserting the Mesoftopic into a megater in which the Mesophical medicine (one philophone; hereinafter “philophone”), which is a local mental medicine at any place in Pyeongtaek-si or Seocheon-si, and then inhales the smoke [one Mesophs” (freba (frebba), the original crogate intake method)].

[ 이에 대하여 피고인/ 변호인은, 피고인이 공소사실과 같은 일시장소에서 필로폰을 투약한 일이 전혀 없고, 다만 소변검사와 모발 검사에서 필로폰 양성반응이 나온 것은 피고인이 평소 복용하여 오던 ‘ 정통 피 앤( 正通片, Zhengtng pian)’ 정통 피 앤은 우리나라 세관당국에서 반입을 금지하는 마약 성분이 포함된 약물이다.

The defendant is not a shipbuilding but a North Korean defectors, even in North Korea, there was a report that there was a ban on the introduction of domestic drugs with drug ingredients such as Habnb in North Korea, and that there was a report that there was a report that there was a strict punishment when the defendant trades the drug before the escape of North Korea in 2007.

In addition, the Defendant, as alleged by the Defendant, administered philophones (Evidence No. 82-83 page of the evidence record) in North Korea, and therefore, if the Defendant saw bnb in the Republic of Korea, as alleged by the Defendant, in addition to the instant crime, the Defendant was aware of the division of narcotics and continuously imprisoning narcotics ingredients even after the escape from North Korea, and thus, it is more likely to have committed a crime.

However, there is no objective evidence to support the above assertion by Defendant/Defense Counsel, and thus, it should not be considered in sentencing.

C argues that it is only the detection of drug ingredients, and continue to see it.

However, in full view of the evidence examined and adopted by this court, the above facts of crime can be sufficiently recognized.