logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.04.08 2014가합16223
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 78,541 as well as 5% per annum from July 19, 2012 to April 8, 2015 and the next day.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion is that the defendant is "A et al., the plaintiff's put to the plaintiff on July 15, 201."

In addition, around July 201, 201, the provisional seizure order against C’s deposits issued by the C was served with computerized inputs to the effect that the payment was prohibited, and was withdrawn on July 18, 201, and around July 2012, around KRW 70,000 as its credit card payment bond.

The defendant's withdrawal and offset disposition are contrary to the validity of the above provisional seizure order, and therefore constitute a tort against the deceased. Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff who solely inherited the damage claim against the deceased against the defendant.

2. The following facts are acknowledged based on Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6, 10, 14, 15, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7, the defendant of this court against the defendant of this court, the whole purport of the arguments in response to each order to submit financial transaction information as of February 6, 2014, and March 12, 2014.

A. In order to preserve the loan claims against C, the deceased’s decision of provisional seizure and delivery of claims are as follows: (a) the obligor is the Ulsan District Court; (b) the Defendant is the third obligor; and (c) the provisional seizure of claims against the following claims is as follows: (a) the provisional seizure of claims is “the provisional seizure of this case”

on July 13, 2011, the above court made a decision to accept the above provisional seizure application.

141,00,000 won Obligor C has against the defendant of a third party obligor, up to the amount claimed in the order stated below among the following deposit claims:

1. In case where there are deposits which have not been seized or deposits which have been seized, provisional seizure shall be effected in the following order:

(1) A deposit which has not been subject to seizure or seizure (2) prior seizure or seizure;

2. In case there are several kinds of deposits, provisional seizure shall be effected in the following order:

(1) An ordinary deposit, (2) a current account, (3) a term deposit, (4) a term deposit, (5) a term deposit.

3. The same kind;

arrow