1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the argument of the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, this court's decision is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is identical to the reasoning of the first instance court except for dismissal as set forth in paragraph (2) below.

2. The height of the first instance court Decision 2007 Radan91 in the second 9th 9th 2nd son shall be deemed to read “2007 Mana291”.

The 10th 10th 10th am " September 9, 1995" shall be deemed to be " September 9, 1955".

The "B" in the third one of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be the "Defendant".

During the 17th 17th 17th e.g., "Defendants purchased from the above K's heir" is regarded as "transfer of ownership in the name of the defendant purchased from the above K's heir."

The term "D's heir" in the 4th 12th 12th e.g., the term "K's heir name".

The term "title of name" in the 13th sentence of the judgment of the first instance shall be changed to the term "title of name".

The 5th 16th 16th 16th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth.

In the first instance court's decision 6 pages 9, "I do not have," "I do not have," and in the 6th 9-11th 6th 9-11, "Co-owned land shall be deemed to be the possession of another co-owner within the scope of the shares of other co-owners, unless there are any special circumstances otherwise, even if one co-owner occupies the entire land (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Da7898, Jun. 26, 2008)."

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant is obligated to execute the registration procedure for ownership transfer on the land of this case to the plaintiff for the restoration of real name. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case seeking the performance must be accepted for the reasons.

The judgment of the first instance court is just in its conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.