logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원충주지원 2014.10.16 2013가합1709
건축주명의변경절차이행
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. C, D, and D’s wife established the Plaintiff on August 13, 2012. At the time, C and D respectively owned 3,000 units among the total 10,000 units of equity, and the Defendant owned 4,00 units of equity, respectively.

B. C, on September 10, 2012, acquired all the Plaintiff’s contribution units of 7,000 shares owned by the Defendant, and became a 100% equity right holder of the Plaintiff, and was appointed as the representative director of the Plaintiff on the same day.

C. Even after C became the representative director of the Plaintiff, D was in charge of the Plaintiff’s practical operation, and the Plaintiff’s corporate perception was also managed by D.

C around May 2013, D issued 10 copies of a certificate of personal seal impression and 10 copies of a certificate of personal seal impression to D. D, on May 6, 2013, using the above certificate of personal seal impression and the certificate of personal seal impression, transferred 4,500 shares of the Plaintiff’s number of equity shares held by C to E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”), and 1,500 shares of the above number of equity shares on the same day to F, respectively.

(hereinafter “each transfer contract of this case”). (e)

With respect to the instant building, registration of ownership preservation was made in the name of the Defendant on April 25, 2012, and registration of ownership transfer was made on June 4, 2013 under the name of the Plaintiff on the ground of sale as of June 3, 2013.

F. On July 4, 2013, Defendant, E, and F drafted a written consent of all the members to the effect that “Defendant, G, H, I, and F, who are all members of the Plaintiff, appointed each Plaintiff’s director, J as the Plaintiff’s auditor, and F as the Plaintiff’s representative director,” and the following content was registered.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap 2, 4, 5, 8 through 13 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul 2, 3, 4, 9 through 12, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the parties’ assertion

A. Since the Defendant sold the instant building to the Plaintiff around June 3, 2013, the Plaintiff, as the seller of the instant building, was the Plaintiff, who was the buyer.

arrow