logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.10.02 2015고합153
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(강간등상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.

The information on the accused shall be disclosed through an information and communications network for six years.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On October 8, 2007, the defendant and the respondent for an attachment order (hereinafter referred to as "defendant") were sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million due to the crime of violation of the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and the Protection of Victims, etc. (Indecent Acts at Public Smuggling Places) at the Daegu District Court on October 8, 2007. On April 13, 201, the court was notified of a summary order of KRW 2 million due to quasi-indecent acts by the same court on April 13, 201, and on January 4, 2013, the same court was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million due to a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse.

【A person subject to registration of personal information of a sex crime, who was a person subject to registration of a sex offense, but was living in a large area and a dong zone without a specific place of residence, found that the victim C of Grade III with intellectual disability (the victim 34 years old) is living in the square of the large area on March 2015, while living in a old room in the middle and middle region, and tried to enter into a sex relationship with the victim.

Therefore, the defendant, by "the same mar," brought the victim to a neighboring restaurant, followed by drinking together, and tried to live together with the victim who had discussed the victim's grievances about board and lodging for the same period, and brought the victim to a nearby brigade.

However, unlike the intention of the defendant, the victim did not respond to the demand of the defendant for the sex relationship during several days, and the scambling of the scambling due to intellectual disorder, and the scambling of the scam to the defective victim.

Of that, on March 29, 2015, the Defendant demanded that the victim “I Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

arrow