Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Defendant A and the judgment of the court of second instance shall be reversed in entirety.

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence sentenced by Defendant A A 1 to the Defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The first instance judgment of the prosecutor against the Defendants (Defendant B: 2 years of suspended sentence in October) and the second instance judgment against Defendant A, which was sentenced by the second instance judgment against the Defendants, are too uneased and unreasonable.

2. As the judgment of the court below and the judgment of the court of first instance against Defendant A, each of the above defendants filed an appeal against the judgment of the court of first instance and the judgment of the court of second instance, and this court decided to hold two appeals together for a trial

Defendant

Since each crime of the first and second judgment against A is concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, one sentence should be imposed. Therefore, the part against Defendant A and the second judgment of the court below cannot be maintained as they are.

3. 검사의 피고인 B에 대한 양형 부당 주장에 관한 판단 원심은, 접근 매체 양도 등의 범행은 금융거래 명의 인에 대한 사회 일반의 신용을 저해하고 전화금융 사기 등 각종 범행을 한 자의 검거 및 피해자의 피해 회복을 곤란하게 하는 등 사회적 폐해가 커 엄한 처벌이 필요한 점, 피고인이 공범들과 계획적ㆍ조직적으로 이 사건 범행을 저질렀고, 양도한 접근 매체가 국내뿐 아니라 국외로도 넘어가 보이스피싱 및 인터넷 도박 등의 범행에 이용된 점 등을 불리한 정상으로, 피고인의 범행 가담 정도가 상대적으로 가벼운 점, 이종의 죄로 벌금형으로 2회 처벌 받은 것 이외 별다른 범행 전력이 없는 점, 뒤늣게나마 범행을 반성하고 있는 점 등을 유리한 정상으로 각각 참작하여 위와 같은 형을 선고 하였다.

In addition to the circumstances considered by the court below, the age, sex, environment, health, circumstances leading to the crime, means and results of the crime, the degree of participation in the crime, and the scale of the crime.