The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant are that the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime, that there is no same kind of power, and that F, G, and H wanted to take the Defendant’s wife against the Defendant.

However, the crime of false accusation is a crime that impairs the proper trial function of the State penal authority and causes a person without a high possibility of criticism. The defendant was subject to emergency arrest and investigation due to violence against F, G, and H in the Japanese term "B", and the defendant was flicker upon E at the time of committing the crime. From April 8, 2011 to April 14, 201, he was employed by the F, G, and H as a female sex trade in a sexual traffic business establishment operated by H, and moved him to an investigative agency for a long time after receiving a request of appearance from the F, G, and H to the same effect that he would have become aware of the fact that he would have not come to know about more than once," and the defendant would not be subject to any false accusation, and the defendant's motive that he would have been forced to go to go to the house, and that he would not have been forced to go to get more than once, and that he would not have been forced to go to get more than once, and that he would not have been forced to go to do so.