Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and misunderstandings, and that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same crime.

However, the crime of this case was committed by deceiving a victim who was an employee of the user who was operated by the defendant, and thus, the nature of the crime is very poor because it intentionally acquired money by using the personal trust relationship with the victim, the victim seems to have obtained a big psychological and economic compromise due to the crime of this case, and the victim did not agree with the victim and did not fully recover from the damage. The scope of the recommended sentence for the crime of this case according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing established by the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court is limited to 1 year to 2 years and 6 months from the year of imprisonment, and the scope of the recommended sentence for the crime of this case is a fraud group, general fraud, type 1, special person (a serious factor: a factor causing serious damage to the victim), aggravated area, the scope of the recommended sentence (one to two years and 6 months), and other various sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, criminal records, environment, motive of the crime, and the situation before and after the crime are too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.