logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.08.23 2017고단1618
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) heard the horses that “it is prohibited from entering a game site under the influence of alcohol” from the victim D’s “E Game site” operated by the victim D in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on March 18, 2017; and (b) heard the horses that “I would make a fright and play a game.”

A large amount of 1-hours such as "I can close the door of the game room", and the game room was sealed by hand, tobacco in the game room, etc., so that customers could not enter the place.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the operation of the game room by force of the victim.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, and insultd, on March 18, 2017, the game room’s corridor as stated in paragraph (1) on March 18, 2017, stated that “the Defendant is engaged in illegal business” is under the influence of alcohol to obtain confirmation on the details of the report from the slope G belonging to the Franc Police Station of the Seoul Central District Police Station, which was dispatched after receiving a report from 112, and the Defendant is under the influence of alcohol to obtain a demand for confirmation on the details of the report.

There was a great interest in removal from office, removal, removal, etc., and the two arms of the above G, which are solicited to return home, were sealed by hand, and threatened as if they were taken into drinking.

While there are a majority of customers in the game room, the Defendant continuously expressed a great voice to H (the 31st, the 31st, the age of the police station) as follows: “The police will be removed from office and thrown away inside the gue, and the gue will be dismissed and thrown away.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases, and publicly insulting the victim H.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness G, witness H and witness D;

1. The president of the H’s complaint;

1. A criminal investigation report (attaching a list to handle reported cases) (112);

1. Photographs (Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTVs inside game rooms);

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and Article 314 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the pertinent provision of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of punishment.

arrow