logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017. 10. 31. 선고 2017가소53968 판결
민사집행법에 따른 강제집행절차와 국세징수법에 따른 체납처분절차는 별개의 절차임[국승]
Title

Procedures for compulsory execution under the Civil Execution Act and those for disposition on default under the National Tax Collection Act are separate procedures;

Summary

Since the compulsory execution procedure under the Civil Execution Act and the procedure for the disposition on default under the National Tax Collection Act are separate procedures, even if a wage creditor who has preferential right to payment was issued a seizure and collection order, it cannot be deemed as unjust enrichment unless the tax authority participates in the delinquent procedure.

Cases

2017 Ghana53968 ( October 31, 2017)

Plaintiff

○ ○

Defendant

Korea

Imposition of Judgment

October 31, 2017

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff 4,834,824 won with 20% interest per annum from February 24, 2017 to the day of full payment.

Reasons

Since the compulsory execution procedure under the Civil Execution Act and the procedure for disposition on default under the National Tax Collection Act are separate procedures, even if the plaintiff was issued a seizure and collection order under the Civil Execution Act as a wage obligee having preferential right to payment, unless the defendant participated in the procedure for arrears under the National Tax Collection Act, it cannot be deemed as unjust enrichment.

arrow