The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. The ground for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is added to the evidence submitted in this

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment under the following paragraph (2).

2. The addition;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion ① from January 2018 to December 2018, Defendant B participated in the meetings of the president of the Plaintiff Association’s branch from January 2018. Around August 2018, D branch withdrawn not from the Plaintiff Association but from January 2019.

② The unpaid amount of D Branch is KRW 5,349,00 in total from January 2018 to August 2018 (i.e., KRW 755,000 + KRW 655,000 + KRW 655,000 + KRW 648,000 + KRW 641,000 + + KRW 634,000 + KRW 634,000 + KRW 656,000 + the Defendants remitted part of the amount received by D Branch from each branch and general secretary of D branch to the Plaintiff, and partially embezzled by omission from September 2018 to January 2019). The amount is KRW 9,825,00 in total.

B. Determination 1) First of all, according to the Plaintiff’s assertions 1 and 2-1, 2-2, and 4 as to the Plaintiff’s assertions 1, 2018, D branch decided to withdraw from the Plaintiff Association on August 2018, and notified the Plaintiff Association of the fact. Each of the descriptions of evidence No. 10 (including each number) alone is insufficient to reverse the Plaintiff’s assertions 10, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it (the foregoing, even if the documents submitted by the Plaintiff after the closing of argument are added thereto).

(2) As to the Plaintiff’s assertion that the unpaid amount is KRW 5,349,000 from January 2018 to August 2018, 2018, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit, and as such, the unpaid amount is KRW 709,000 in total, as stated in the judgment of the first instance.