logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.12.24 2015고정1716
화물자동차운수사업법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a transportation business employee belonging to the Dispute Settlement Bank D Co., Ltd., and Defendant B is the representative of the said Dispute Settlement Bank D Co., Ltd.

1. Defendant A: (a) even if a private-use truck is not provided or leased for a commercial cargo transport, at the house of the EF located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si; (b) around September 8, 2015, Defendant A received KRW 900,000,000 from the above F, and transported approximately KRW 2 km, up to KRW 1,00,00,000,000, to a private-use truck owned by Defendant G, carrying an article on the truck for private use of H 1 ton of the Defendant’s life, and transported approximately KRW 2 km to the

Accordingly, the defendant provided a private-use truck to a cargo transport for a fee.

2. Defendant B, with respect to his duties, committed the same offense as that of the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Report on investigation (the content of the contract);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Subparagraph 7 of Article 67 and Article 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act;

(b) Defendant B: Article 69(2), Article 67 subparag. 7, and Article 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.

arrow