Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of the D company that employs four workers in Gangnam-si C, and is a person who acts on all matters concerning safety and health of his/her employees.

On October 1, 2013, the Defendant had regular supervision over the accident and death prevention;

(a) The business owner is required to install a stringr on the part where workers, such as machine engines, electric percussion locks, fishing gear, poly-wheel chairs labels, and chains, are likely to face danger, but did not install a stringr on the cut bell used at the work site, and the stringr was not installed;

B. Even though workers have to install a protective net or an efficiener with a effic effect sufficient to the charging department in order to prevent a shock in order to prevent a shock with respect to the charging portions that are in danger of electric shock by having contacted or approaching the charging part due to work, passage, etc., the business owner did not install an efficiencies at the part of the exposed shocks located

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to manufacturing safety, health supervision and checkup marks, supervision reports, and corrective orders;

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 67 and Article 23 (1) of the former Occupational Safety and Health Act (amended by Act No. 11882, Jun. 12, 2013) applicable to criminal facts

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In full view of the following: (a) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment, property status, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., it is difficult to reduce the amount of the fine prescribed in the summary order as well as the amount of the fine prescribed in the summary order, in order to ensure a safe working environment for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Defendant

The defendant and the defense counsel's defense counsel's assertion are all parts of cutting Vs in light of working conditions.