Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who, from August 2006, operates a sing practice hall with the trade name "Ding room" in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C.

No singing practice room business operator shall sell or provide alcoholic beverages.

Nevertheless, at around 02:00 on June 15, 2015, the Defendant sold four cans of “kice”, which are alcoholic beverages, to four players, E, etc., such as customers, at the instant singing practice place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (to hear statements from witnesses E);

1. Article 34 (3) 2 of the Music Industry Promotion Act and Article 22 (1) 3 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel on the grounds of conviction of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which bear the costs of lawsuit, asserts that the defendant only sold low alcohol beverages to E, etc. while operating a singing practice place at the time, and that there is no room for selling can cans and beers.

However, the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., ① E and F, etc., stated to the effect that “dysing four cans in the instant singing practice place” was “dysing four cans in the instant singing practice place” in the course of investigation as the victim of the assault case at the time, and ② the witness E et al. were dysing in the singing room at the time of the trial, although the mutual systyism at the time of the trial,

It refers to the fact that the defendant made a statement to the effect that he did not know about the low alcohol beverage as claimed by the defendant. ③ The E/F made a false statement with no particular interest in the defendant

In light of the fact that it is difficult to find the circumstances to view, and rather, the defendant was punished several times for the same kind of crime, the defendant's assertion is as it is.