logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.29 2014고단8400
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, with respect to the defendant BH, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a person who operates the LAS, and BO called one-person BN is a person who solicits a mobile phone name provider who does not actually use it, and Defendant BH is a person who runs a mobile phone opening brokerage business, and BP, Q and BR is a cell phone openinger.

1. Defendant B’s fraud created and disposed of a mobile phone in the name of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and received a proposal from the withdrawr by dividing profits, and agreed to open a mobile phone in the name of the corporation without intent to use the mobile phone normally and receive the mobile phone from the victim company to dispose of it.

around March 2014, in order to open a mobile phone in the name of the defendant's office in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the defendant delivered documents, such as the registration certificate for the settlement of disputes, the certificate of the corporation's personal seal impression, the defendant's identification card, and the certificate of the personal seal impression, to BH, and BH sent the documents received from the defendant to BP through BP, which verified that the number of cell phoness that can be opened in the name of the dispute settlement bank, was 46, and notified the defendant to the victim company through BP, BP delivers the documents received from BH to B, BR, and B and BR deliver the documents received from BH to B, B, and B, as the defendant's subscription agent, prepared an application for opening a cell phone and submitted them to BS agency, and submitted them to the victim company for use the cell phone device normally and pay the price or the fee for using the cell phone normally, and requested the victim company to open 46 mobile phone in the name of the dispute settlement bank.

As such, the Defendant, in collusion with BO, etc., did not intend to normally use the device price or pay the mobile phone usage fee.

arrow