logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.05.31 2012고단5266
사기
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On September 15, 201, the Defendants were hospitalized in the F Hospital Hospital Hospital Hospital Hospital in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the early 201, Defendant A received temporary layoff benefits (a total of KRW 11,447,520 from September 1, 201 to December 15 of the same year) due to an accident that falls at the construction site around May 14, 2010, the complainant was receiving temporary disability compensation benefits (a total of KRW 11,447,520 from September 1, 201 to December 15, 201), with the knowledge that, after completing the registration of the disabled, the Defendants conspired to acquire money from the complainants.

On November 17, 2011, the Defendants stated to the effect that “The Deputy Prosecutor General of the Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office and A are in friendly relationship, so the Defendants would make the complainant not guilty by filing a final appeal with the Supreme Court. I change the teaching expenses.”

However, in fact, Defendant A was not between the Deputy Prosecutor General and ASEAN of the Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office, and there was no intention or ability to make the complainant a favorable judgment in the process of the above trial.

The Defendants, as above, deceiving the complainant and received KRW 1 million in cash from the complainant, i.e., from the complainants, and acquired KRW 33.6 million in total from the complainants over three times from the time to December 21 of the same year, as shown in the annexed List of Crimes (1).

As a result, the Defendants conspired to deception the complainant and received property and acquired property benefits.

B. On September 4, 2011, Defendant A’s sole criminal administration of Defendant A changed to the effect that “H” restaurant located under the above FF hospital, and Defendant A changed to the complainant in the name of “the 500,000 won in the name of the introduction cost to reduce the construction cost of the KGH signboard.”

arrow