The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Damages suffered by misunderstanding of facts and legal principles are minor to the extent that it cannot be assessed as injury under Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and there was a need to rescue victims.

In addition, although the defendant did not know that it was necessary to rescue victims at the time of the occurrence of the accident, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes against the defendant is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles or in the misapprehension

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (two years of suspended execution in June, and forty hours of the compliance driving) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court’s determination on the assertion of misunderstanding the facts and misapprehension of the legal doctrine is based on the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, namely, ① the degree of damage of each vehicle discovered by the damaged vehicle and the photographic image of the Defendant driver, etc. immediately after the occurrence of the instant accident, appears to have been reasonable in view of the degree of damage of each vehicle caused by the accident; ② the victim C, the driver of the victimized vehicle, “the victim F who requested the driver to drive on his/her behalf

하고 있고, 자신은 하룻밤 지나 봐야 상태를 알 수 있을 것 같다’ 고 진술하였고, 피해차량에 동승한 피해자 F은 ‘ 사고로 인하여 오른쪽 무릎이 아프다’ 고 진술한 점, ③ 피해자 F은 사고 당일인 2015. 8. 28. J 의원에 내원하여 ‘ 요추의 염좌 및 긴장, 경추의 염좌 및 긴장, 어깨 관절의 염좌 및 긴장’ 의 병명으로 진단을 받았고, 피해자 F이 2015. 9. 2. 발급 받은 진단서에 ‘ 약물 및 물리치료 중’ 이라 기재되어 있어 실제 이 사건 사고로 인한 상해 부위에 대해 치료를 받은 것으로 보이는 점, ④ 피해자 C도 사고 다음 날인 2015. 8. 29. K 정형외과의원에서 ‘ 경추의...