logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.02.15 2018고단6276
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for three months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 8, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a period of one year and six months for fraud, etc. in the Hongsung Branch of the Daejeon District Court on December 14, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 17, 2017. On October 25, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a period of one year and six months for fraud.

The telephone financial fraud criminal organization is operating a call center in China through the Internet international telephone, etc. in order to identify many unspecified persons, to inform them of false facts, and to receive money directly from victims or to transfer the account, etc., and is operating the center in China as a general responsibility in China, call center scamscamscamscamscamscamscams and moneyscams moneyscams to the victims such as the prosecution, financial institutions, etc., to transfer moneyscams to the victims, to transfer moneyscamscams to remittances, and to collect or withdraw moneyscams from victims.

From the beginning of November 2016, the Defendant had been responsible for the duty of withdrawing the amount of damage from November 17, 2016, when he had been given instructions from the person who caused the said telephone financial fraud to the mobile phone B Messenger.

On November 28, 2016, the above person under whose name the victim was called the victim C, and misrepresented the investigator E of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Team E and the name omitted inspection, and the Franchisation of identity case (2016No. 5068) was followed. The above person under whose name the victim was the victim and the victim was the victim, who received the loan under his/her name, made a false statement that he/she would be the victim and that the victim would be relieved

However, the above-mentioned person was not a prosecutor or prosecutory investigator, and there was no fact that the victim's name was stolen, and there was no money.

arrow