logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2020.10.07 2019구단11614
건축이행강제금부과처분취소
Text

(3) The imposition of the charge for compelling the performance of the imposed amount shall be made by the Defendant on the date of imposition.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiffs are completed the registration of ownership transfer for the building from each owner on the date of change of ownership.

In 2014 and 2015, public officials belonging to Kimhae-si conducted a fact-finding survey on each building in violation of the Building Act in 2014 and 2015 and discovered the following facts differently from the current state on the original building register, without obtaining permission from or filing a report on each building listed in attached Table 1:

Plaintiff

In the current violation of the location of a building, a household with 4th household extension without permission for a 5th household of 5th household of 5th household of 5th household of 5th household of 5th household of 5th household of 5th household of 5th household of 5th household of 5th household of 4th household of 4th household of 2th large scale repair without permission for a 4th household of 4th household of 4 second household of 4th household of 2 second household of 4th household of 4th household of 2th household of 4th large scale repair without permission for a 4th household of 4th household of 2th household of 4th household of 2th household of 4th 2th household of 4th household of 4th household of 1 second household of 5th household of 5th household of 5th household of

C. The Defendant issued a corrective order pursuant to the provisions related to the Building Act after detecting each of the above large-scale repair, extension, and change of the purpose of use. Since each of the above extension was corrected but the large-scale repair and change of the purpose of use were not corrected, the Defendant respectively issued a disposition imposing a non-performance penalty (hereinafter “each of the instant dispositions”) on the date of imposition.

[Based on the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including each number), and the purport of the entire pleadings as to the computation ratio of the plaintiffs' large-scale repair of claims by the plaintiffs as to whether the disposition of the whole pleadings is legitimate, the standard market price, which serves as the basis for calculating the charges for compelling the performance of each of the plaintiffs, is "the standard for adjusting the standard market price of buildings in 2019" (hereinafter referred to as "the standard for adjusting the standard for adjusting the standard market price of buildings in 2019").

arrow