1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 54,308,527 as well as KRW 44,950,00 among them, from December 9, 2014 to the day of full payment.

1. According to the evidence No. 1 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff entered into a supply contract with the Defendant for the U.S., and supplied the Defendant a total of KRW 184,950,000 for four times from May 22, 2014 to May 27, 2014. The Plaintiff is a person who received a total of KRW 184,950,000 from the Defendant for the supply of KRW 274 to the Defendant. The Plaintiff is a person who received a total of KRW 140,000,000 for the supply of goods from the Defendant on November 18, 2014 and KRW 140,000,000 for the supply of goods ( KRW 100,000,000 for the supply of goods).

According to the above facts, the defendant has an obligation to pay to the plaintiff 4,950,00 won (184,950,000 won - 140,000,000 won) and 184,950 won after the final supply date, barring special circumstances, 3,617,926 won (184,950,000 x 605% per annum under the Commercial Act from June 5, 2014 to October 1, 2014 (184,950,000 x 6% x 6% 119/365, less than won, 184, 950,000 won x 205% per annum 94, 205, 205, 905, 207, 9405, 205, 94, 207, etc. of damages for delay as provided for in the Act.

2. The defendant's assertion is alleged to the effect that the defendant would not respond to the plaintiff's claim because the plaintiff could not respond to the plaintiff's claim because the plaintiff and the defendant did not sell the goods after Bori processing when concluding a Boriri Service supply contract with the plaintiff. However, it is recognized that the plaintiff and the defendant have an agreement for such payment.