The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s partial acceptance and amendment of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as stated in the following 2. Thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. Parts to be dried;

A. Two pages 17 part of "1962" on November 26, 1961

2. As to the land and the land without permission on the 19th to the 3rd "Purchase" of the F 19th to the 19th "F," the 19th to the 19th "F," the lot number was changed to K, and the land was purchased.

C. From 3rd to 18th to 3rd 19th 19, the Plaintiff terminated a loan agreement for use with respect to the third floor of the instant building on May 13, 2013, following the lapse of sufficient period for the Defendant to use and benefit from the third floor of the instant building.

D. From 4th to 4th 8th 4th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 8th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 5th 4th 4th 4th 5th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 4th 4th 1st 1st 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 4th 4th 4th 600 6th 6th 19

However, D, among the six parcels of land including the instant land, collected all their shares by selling all the remaining parcels of land except the instant land, and using them as living expenses, etc., and in light of the fact that the sales price of the remaining parcels of land except the instant land was higher than the price of the instant land.