logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2013.12.12 2013고단978
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 30, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment due to fraud, etc. in the Daegu District Court Port Branch Branch on August 30, 2012, and completed the enforcement of the sentence at the port prison on March 7, 2013.

[2013 Highest 978]

1. From June 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) took advantage of the gapss behind the home fracker store located in the north-gu death dong at Port on the Mapo-si on June 30, 2013, the Defendant: (b) cut off one copy of the victim’s resident registration certificate; (c) one copy of the Daegu Bank Cmke card; (d) one copy of the agricultural bank Cmke card; (d) one cash 13,000 won; and (e) one bank with an unfasible wall in the market price.

2. On June 30, 2013, from around 02:21 to 09:56 the same day, the Defendant received an order from the F cafeteria operated by the victim E in the north-gu north-gu, Northern-si, with an alcoholic beverage equivalent to KRW 1,050,00, and received an order from the victim E, as stated in paragraph (1). As stated in paragraph (1), the Defendant presented stolen- C Bank C C C C C C cke card and Nonghyup C cke card as if he was his body card and had the victim settle it with the relevant body card.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, exempted the payment of the drinking value equivalent to KRW 1,050,000, obtained economic benefits equivalent to the same amount.

3. The Defendant violated the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, like Paragraph 2, used a stolen debit card by issuing the stolen C’s C C C C C C C C’s Cyke card or Daegu Bank’s Cyke card to E as if he was his debit card and paying KRW 1,050,000 of the drinking value.

[2013 Highest 1153]

1. From June 14, 2013 to 03:00 on June 14, 2013, the Defendant: (a) obtained one lock of a credit card with a new bank owned by the victim H, whose possession was lost in the old world of the south-gu G (hereinafter referred to as 03:30 at a coastal port; (b) but did not take necessary procedures, such as returning it to the victim; and (c) took the thought that he/she had it.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

2. Fraud;

A. Paragraph 1 is applicable to the Defendant.

arrow