1. The Plaintiff indicated in attached Form 1, 91, 100 to 112, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 91, 10, 100 to 112, 87, 88, 89, 90, and 91, 19

1. Basic facts

A. The registration relationship between the land before subdivision and the registration of the land before subdivision (1) was conducted in the name of the west-gun, Jinsung-gun (hereinafter “Seoul-gun”) on March 20, 1918.

(2) On February 28, 1939, the land before the instant partition had been registered for ownership preservation in the name of the Western, but the ownership transfer registration was made in M, N,O, or P on the same day.

(3) On June 2, 1942 with respect to the land prior to the instant subdivision, M’s ownership transfer registration was made to the net Qu (U.S.). On June 22, 1970, the ownership transfer registration was made in the name of the net Q, the Defendant A, the Defendant B, the network S, and the network T.

B. (1) After the division, the land before the division was registered as a unit of area converted into the area of 86876 square meters on September 3, 1999. On July 7, 2017, the land before the division was divided into the area of 7891 square meters for Gosung-gun I Forest Land (hereinafter “I land after division”) and the area of 7895 square meters for U forest land.

(2) On October 2, 2018, the net equity in the I land was transferred to Defendant C on September 18, 2018 due to inheritance due to a division held before September 18, 2018, and thereafter on July 18, 2019, the ownership transfer registration was made for the gift made on July 17, 2019.

(3) On July 18, 2019, the net Q shares out of the I land was transferred to Defendant D on December 11, 200 on the following day after the completion of the ownership transfer registration based on the gift made on July 17, 2019.

C. Inheritance-related Network S died on April 9, 1993, and the wife J succeeded to 3/15, Defendant E, F, G, Defendant (Appointed Party), H, Appoint, and L, each of 2/15 shares.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 14 to 21, and 26, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The judgment network Q, net T, Plaintiff A, the network S, and Defendant B regarding the claim against Defendant C, D, and Defendant (Appointed Party) was classified and owned by specifying the location and size of I forest land before each party’s subdivision. The Plaintiff’s partitioned forest land was divided and owned by the Plaintiff Company A, and the land attached to I land after the division.