logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.01.24 2015가단2879
제3자이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Around 2010, the net B and F’s building delivery litigation network B (hereinafter “the network”) filed a lawsuit against F, the Plaintiff’s representative, such as the transfer of land against F, the Plaintiff, seeking the delivery of the instant building on October 26, 2012, by which the court rendered a judgment of accepting the above claim of the deceased on the following grounds: Cement 2010Gadan805, which is a cement brick slock 74.25 square meters, cement brick slock slock slock slock slock slock slock slocks and one story 6.27 square meters, and sand position 74.45 square meters (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the instant building”).

F The appeal and appeal were lodged against the above judgment, but the appeal and appeal were dismissed, and the above judgment became final and conclusive around April 2014.

B. The delivery and execution of the instant building, and the deceased’s corporeal movables were finalized on May 2014 by the court against F around this Court.

On October 7, 2014, the enforcement officer of the instant case filed an application for compulsory execution as to the instant building with the enforcement title, and the enforcement officer of the instant court conducted delivery execution as to the instant building under this Court’s 2014No2273 on the ground that the said judgment was the enforcement title.

H kept corporeal movables listed in the attached list (hereinafter “the instant corporeal movables”) within the instant building, while executing the delivery execution as to the instant building. Accordingly, the deceased stored the instant corporeal movables in J Container in Gwangju Mine-gu I (K).

C. Around November 2014, the deceased applied for a realization order and the deceased’s selling of the instant corporeal movables. Around November 2014, the enforcement officer of the instant court delegated by the deceased applied for the permission for the sale of movables, and H was determined to grant the permission for the sale of movables on L of this court.

According to the decision of permission for the sale of the said movables, the deceased seized the instant corporeal movables under this Court No. 2014No6495 with respect to the said corporeal movables, and thereafter conducts the auction procedure for corporeal movables.

arrow