logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.05.08 2013고단1665
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The Defendant is an employee of a sexual traffic business establishment, who rents a studio in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dtel and employs a female, etc. with the name of "E" and operates a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name of "F", and is engaged in arranging sexual traffic.

Between August 2012 and August 31, 2012, the Defendant: (a) reported advertisements on the instant officetels; and (b) promised to provide Internet arrangement sites; and (c) had female employees, such as “E” receive KRW 150,000 per man from the unspecified male descendants who had discovered, and had had them do sexual intercourse with male descendants in the said officetel’s room.

Accordingly, the defendant conspiredd with his name-free persons and arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendant does not repeat the reason for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, etc. and Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act. The Defendant continues to engage in the business of arranging sexual traffic despite the fact that the Defendant, who was not an employee and the Defendant, was crackdownd on August 13, 2012, which was neither previous. In addition, in light of the Defendant’s statement and attitude during the investigation process, the Defendant is likely to repeat the said act. Accordingly, the Defendant is likely to be subject to suspended sentence, but is sentenced to probation and community service as ordered by the Disposition

arrow