beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 30,000,000 to Plaintiff A, and KRW 10,000,000 to Plaintiff B, and each of them on June 1, 2013.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Plaintiff B is the mother of Plaintiff A, and Defendant D and E are the parents of Defendant C, Defendant G and H are the parents of Defendant F, and Defendant J and K are the parents of Defendant I.
B. Defendant C and F were indicted with the District Court for the following facts charged (hereinafter “instant crime”), etc. (2013 senior 4450, 2013 senior 462, etc.). Accordingly, the District Court rendered a ruling of transmission to Defendant C and F of the Juvenile Department on November 29, 2013.
In addition, Defendant I was also subject to a protective disposition under the Juvenile Act due to the instant crime.
At around 14:00 on June 1, 201, Defendant C, F, and I together with L, M, and N, set aside Q (12 years old at that time) and Plaintiff A (13 years old at that time) from Pelher 301 room located in Gyeonggi-gun Group O, Gyeonggi-do, Q and Plaintiff A, forced the Plaintiff to drink “mort” game, and forced the Plaintiff to drink Q and Plaintiff A to drink and commit indecent acts and rape.
Defendant C and F, together with MN, exceeded the upper and lower lele by using a creb that Plaintiff A could not resist due to the diversity of alcohol, and Defendant I and M met the chest of Plaintiff A, N met the chest of Plaintiff A, Plaintiff A’s chest, Plaintiff A’s sexual intercourse with Defendant C once, Defendant F has sexual intercourse with Plaintiff A, Defendant F had sexual intercourse with Plaintiff A once, while L attempted to rape the Plaintiff, but did not go through a sexual lebation, and was not intended.
As a result, Defendant C, F, and I were raped by the Plaintiff, a child, using the state of the Plaintiff’s refusal to resist from alcohol.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6 and 7 (which include branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. According to the fact that Defendant C, F, and I's respective liability for damages is recognized, Defendant C, F, and I are in accordance with Article 750 of the Civil Act.