A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 29, 2016, at around 00:40, the Defendant: (a) was found to have driven alcohol on the roads of “C” restaurant “C,” located in Kimhae-si B, and (b) was found to have been driven by a police officer, such as a police station E DistrictF belonging to the Kimhae-si Police Station E DistrictF, the Defendant attempted to demand a measurement of drinking again; (c) sought to go against F while demanding a measurement of drinking again; (d) he was a patrol officer belonging to the same district group, and (e) was able to get off the G with a lower part of G by hand, thereby putting it over the bottom floor.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on traffic control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each statement, investigation report (as to attachment of photographs);

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act in the suspended sentence is [unfair circumstances] one and three times of a fine under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act. Among them, the two times of a fine is a previous crime of violence [a favorable condition], and there is no previous crime of violence [a favorable condition]. All of the previous criminal records of violence are prior to 200 years, the defendant is seriously against the truth, the defendant has assisted the ordinary police as a camera article, and the defendant has assisted the ordinary police officer by finding several times, and the defendant has received a letter from the damaged police officer.