The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

After being appointed as an electrical assistant on July 18, 1983, the Plaintiff was promoted to an industrial officer on October 22, 2018, and served as the chief of the post office B post office of the Ministry of Science and Technology.

On October 16, 2019, following the resolution of the Central Disciplinary Committee on the ground that the Plaintiff committed the following misconducts (hereinafter “the instant misconducts”) and violated the duty to maintain dignity under Article 63 of the State Public Officials Act, the Defendant was demoted to the Plaintiff on October 16, 2019.

(hereinafter “Disposition.” On April 18, 2019, while under the influence of 00:12% of blood alcohol concentration, the Plaintiff driven a CCo-C car at around 0.062%, and driven a approximately 4 km distance from the Damam-dong am-dong am-dong am-dong am-dong am-dong, in the area near the Dam-gu, Changwon-si, Changwon District Prosecutors’ Office on May 8, 2019. In this regard, the Plaintiff was subject to a disposition of am-type am-oning a fine of KRW 2,00,000 from the Changwon District Prosecutors’ Office to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (Mam-dong am-on). The Plaintiff’s above act violates Article 63 (Duty to Maintain Goods) of the State Public Officials

On November 8, 2019, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition, filed a petition review with the Ministry of Personnel Management Review Committee. However, the appeals review committee dismissed the Plaintiff’s petition on January 17, 2020.

[Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff’s disposition of this case as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case is excessively harsh to the Plaintiff when considering the following circumstances, the Plaintiff’s disposition of this case constitutes abuse of discretionary power, which constitutes abuse of discretionary power.

On April 17, 2019, at around 18:20, the Plaintiff, at around 20:0, went through a coffee and arrived at the D Station at around 23:50, from the Kimcheon-gu Station.

At that time, the plaintiff made a mistake that the alcohol was broken due to the withdrawal of rest, such as a person who sleeps at a tea, and caused the misconduct of this case by driving the vehicle.