The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the gist of the grounds for appeal of this case is found guilty, the court below found the defendant not guilty by violating the rules of evidence and misunderstanding the facts.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged is the children of the couple operating a mutually cafeteria with the trade name “D” in Scheon-si C, who is employed by the above cafeteria, and the victim E (V, 16) is also employed by the above cafeteria.

피고인은 2013. 3. 10. 22:00경 포천시 C에 있는 ‘F’이라는 상호의 식당에서, 피고인과 피해자를 비롯한 ‘D’ 식당 종업원들끼리 회식 모임을 갖던 중 2013. 3. 11. 01:30경 다른 종업원들이 모두 귀가하여 피고인과 피해자만 남게 된 상황에서 인근에 있는 ‘G’ 노래방으로 들어가 함께 노래를 부르던 중 술에 만취한 피해자의 입에 입맞춤을 하고, 다시 밖으로 나와 2013. 3. 11. 05:00경 포천시 H건물 4층에 있는 ‘I’ DVD방으로 들어가 함께 영화를 보던 중 술에 만취하여 잠이 든 피해자에게 다가가 입맞춤을 하고, 피해자의 가슴 부위를 만진 후 피해자의 바지와 팬티를 벗겨 입으로 피해자의 음부 부위를 핥았다.

As a result, the Defendant committed indecent acts against the victim by using the state of her ability to resist by drinking.

B. The lower court’s judgment: (a) in light of the CCTV images containing the pages in which the Defendant and the victim moved into a singing room and a DoVD; (b) CCTV images containing a device in which the Defendant and the victim moved to a DoVD room and the cab, J’s police statement; and (c) K and the main operator’s confirmation of each fact-finding certificate, etc. on the day of the instant case, it is difficult to readily conclude that the victim was drinking to the extent that the victim was unable to resist or resist; and (b) the victim’s act of driving on the day of the instant case or the Defendant’s physical contact itself is generally recorded.