logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.10.01 2013고단2399
폭행치상등
Text

This case shall not be under the jurisdiction of the court.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, as the mother of the victim E (n, 14 years of age) and the victim’s referred F as the victim’s referred, and as of November 17, 2008, shared agreements. A.

(1) Around 20:00 on December 5, 2008, the Defendant issued a victim (the age of 9 years at the time) with “Isson’s fee by phone” to the victim (the age of 9) at the Defendant’s residence located in Washington G of the United States, but the victim refused to do so, and the victim took care of the victim’s head and loss while taking care of the victim.

(2) On April 2, 2009, the Defendant, at the same place as the above paragraph (a) around 20:00, rendered the victim (at that time, nine years of age) to “the cost of coming to go to go to go to go to go to go to go to go to go to go to go to go to go to go to abegas”, but the victim refused to do so, and the victim took the victim’s head and body by hand while bringing to the victim’s desire to do so.

(3) 피고인은 2009. 6. 20.경 미국 네바다주 라스베가스시 소재 ‘H’호텔에서 피해자(당시 9세)가 오디션을 제대로 보지 못하였다는 이유로 피해자에게 욕설을 하면서 손과 발로 피해자의 몸을 때리고 찼다.

(4) Around 20:00 on September 10, 2009, the Defendant shown the name of the victim (as at that time nine years of age) at the same place as the above paragraph (a) and expressed that “I am by telephone to I am and make a statement to I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am the victim's head while I am. I am. I am. I am.

(5) On May 201, at the same place as the above paragraph (a) of this Article, the Defendant sent a victim (the age of 11 at that time) with the claim that “I am her money by telephone,” and “I am her money” from the victim, thereby leaving the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her with the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her

(6) The Defendant is identical to the foregoing paragraph (a) at the end of May 2011.

arrow