beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Criminal facts
[2017 Highest 2019]
1. On April 25, 2017, the Defendant committed a crime against the victim C at around 10:00, the real estate office of the victim C’s operation located in Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, as if the Defendant visited the above office to purchase the building, and the Defendant tried to purchase the building “.”
In that sense, the taxi has been getting on and off, and there is no rent to get off the taxi. Accordingly, first of all, it is possible to return the money when it comes to the purchase of the building on the face of a loan.
The internal telephone number is E.
“.....”
However, in fact, the defendant did not intend to purchase the building, and the phone number known to the victim is not the telephone number of the defendant, but the victim did not have the intention or ability to repay even if he borrowed money from the victim.
However, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 150,000 won in cash from the injured party.
2. On May 5, 2017, the Defendant, at around 10:30, committed a crime against the Victim F, committed against the Victim F, by the real estate office operated by the Victim F in Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si, with the purport that, as if he would purchase the building, he would engage in the act as if he would purchase the building in the same manner as that described in paragraph 1, and would lend the rent to the victim, and was granted KRW 50,000 in cash from
[2017 Highest 2402] The Defendant, at around 15:45 on September 4, 2015, under the “JJ” management of the victim I located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, Ha, the Defendant would engage in as if the Defendant visited the above store to purchase the product, and the Defendant would purchase the 300,000 won of the active machine 2.3 million won.
The taxi has been getting on and off a taxi, and there is no car to get off a taxi, so first, it is intended to transfer money as when calculating the value of the goods in the face value of the taxi.
“.....”
However, the Defendant did not intend to purchase the product from the injured party as above, and did not have any intent or ability to repay even if he borrowed money from the injured party.
However, the defendant deceivings the victim as above.