beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On March 8, 2013, the Defendant appeared and testified as a witness of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) to the Suwon District Court No. 310 in Suwon District Court No. 310 in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, 120 (Gucheon-dong) on March 8, 2013.
In fact, on September 2, 2009, the Defendant, as the president and acting director of the D clan Association (hereinafter referred to as the “instant clan”), entered into a contract with the said C to sell the land of the land of the 38 parcel of land (hereinafter referred to as the “instant land”) outside the 51.3 billion won, which is the ownership of the instant clan, to the (ju) F, etc., which is operated by C, for a total of 51.3 billion won, and provided the instant land as security to the financial institution, and 5.1 billion won was paid the down payment of the instant land, and the remaining 4.6 billion won was lent to F, and then the Defendant agreed to receive the intermediate payment of the instant land at the time of receiving the intermediate payment of the instant land.
Nevertheless, the Defendant testified to the effect that, as the acting president of the clan of this case, C would not be held liable for the damage to the clan of this case by providing C with the land as collateral, it was false for C to the effect that “The establishment of a collateral on the land of this case is consistent with the establishment of a collateral, but C would actually receive a loan on the basis of this, not only did C know in advance whether it would actually receive a collateral on the land of this case, but also did not expect C would actually pay the down payment of the land of this case with the loan and use the remainder as its operating fund. It was nothing more than that C agreed formally to establish a collateral on the land of this case, but it did not allow C to obtain a loan on the land of this case as collateral.”
Accordingly, the defendant is a witness who has taken an oath under the law and is against his memory.