logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.05.23 2017고단375
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 2016, the Defendant applied for a divorce by agreement with the victim and divorced around January 10, 2017, according to the south of the victim C (V, 39 years of age).

1. On December 3, 2016, at around 02:00, at the victim’s residence, D Apartment 103 1205, Dong 103, Dong 1205, the injured Defendant: (a) heard the horses from the victim in a separate conversation with the victim; (b) sought the victim’s face and body from the victim; and (c) sustained the victim’s face and body from drinking to the victim; and (d) inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the string part of the following arms and the string part, in which the number of days of treatment cannot be known to the victim.

2. Interference with performing public duties;

A. On December 3, 2016, around 03:30 on December 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a report of domestic violence as above, and took a bath to the victim’s residence; (b) stated that the Defendant would enter the victim’s residence; (c) “the fat on the fat of the fat of the cat of the cat of the gu Police Station E District ( South, 34 years old), and G 29 years old; and (d) “the fat of the fat of the cat of the cat of the cat of the cat of the cat of the cat of the cat of the cat of the cat of the cat of the cat of the cat of the cat of the cat of the cat of the f; and

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

B. On December 3, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime at around 03:48 on December 3, 2016, committed an act of assaulting the Defendant, who was arrested as a flagrant offender at around 03:48 on December 3, 2016 in front of the E DistrictH, and moved to the E District in the future, after being arrested as a flagrant offender at around 03:48 on December 3, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C, J, F, G, and I;

1. A certificate of medical treatment;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged victim C;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts

arrow