1. The Defendant’s disposition of suspension from office for two months against the Plaintiff on July 8, 2014 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a Army officer who was assigned to or dismissed from the position on June 16, 2014 and is still on leave of absence under the current Military Headquarters No. 3 Supplementary Zone.

1. On April 24, 2014, the Plaintiff violated the duty to maintain dignity by engaging in any sexual disturbance that may cause a sense of sexual shame to E, while discussing the selection of a combat sports event event at the time of the large-time operation territory of the military unit, the female E, the DJ, the DJ commander, was scheduled to run a horse, and the Plaintiff breached the duty to maintain dignity by engaging in any sexual disturbance that may cause a sense of sexual humiliation to E.

2. The Plaintiff violating the duty to obey (Habitual insult)

A. On February 1, 2014, the position of the female-gun E of the D commander, saying, “If the 1st unit unit unit commander was known to the her husband, the her husband would come to the her husband and come to the her husband and come to the her husband at the home,” and publicly insult E during the middle group meeting, and

B. The above A.

During the statement of subsection (a), E publicly insulting E by stating “I will be too much of education for the people.” This education is a typical prine of the prine, which will be a brine of the prine, and even if so, E would be subject to education; and

C. Around May 2014, citing the examination of “a woman’s fee is shocked to a person who knows himself/herself, and a woman is good to a person who causes him/her to be bad,” thereby openly insulting female forces present at the meeting by highly emphasizing the examination.

D. On May 23, 2014, when referring to the subrogation of the discharged soldiers to the DJ E at the time of a meeting of the soldiers from active service, the term “Is to go to the original DJE,” “Is to go to the same speech every day,” “Is to go to the President of the company, who is aware of a cruel stress every day,” and “Is to go to the public cruel of E, etc.,” and violated the obligation to obey by insulting and insulting the soldiers.

B. The Defendant is against the Plaintiff on July 8, 2014.