The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The possession, administration, etc. of the Defendant’s narcotics at least once is favorable.

On the other hand, the crime of narcotics, such as the instant case, is highly likely to recommit a crime, social harm is very serious, and the Defendant had the record of having been sentenced three times to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime, and the Defendant again committed the crime of this case even if he had been in the period of repeated crime.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.