logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.12 2018가단5043701
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a company with the aim of manufacturing, installing, maintaining, and repairing elevators, escalators, etc., and the Plaintiff concluded a commission work contract with the Defendant from August 18, 2014, and was dispatched to the head office of the department department located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and was in charge of repair, maintenance, and repair of elevators and escalators.

B. On July 15, 2015, at around 11:40, 200, the Plaintiff damaged the Emplate 2 sub-plate 3 to the second floor (the cover installed on the part above Emplate, the fixed ray, and the part where the stairs splates installed under the below) of Emplate 2, which was cut down from CM 3 to the second floor, and caused the Plaintiff by removing 2V, which is fixing the comppact in operation in order to replace the compplate, and then dracking the drick between Empher and stairs spherspher in operation, while dracking the comppher into the comppher, which was fasted into the comppher, and dracking the right side between Emb and the drack, 2, 34, 35, and 5.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). [Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether liability for damages arises;

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant did not assign a person in charge of safety and health management or a supervisor under the Occupational Safety and Health Act; the Defendant did not assign safety personnel at the time of repair of escalators, or did not assign two persons to work as a group; the Plaintiff provided excessive duties; the Plaintiff did not properly check whether the facilities are abnormal; thus, the Plaintiff violated the Plaintiff’s duty to safely protect the Plaintiff by failing to work normally; and the Plaintiff was unreasonably dismissed in violation of the Labor Standards Act.

Therefore, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages caused by the instant accident.

(b).

arrow