The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment is publicly announced.

Ⅰ The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant E Co., Ltd. is a corporation engaged in the food manufacturing and processing business of agricultural and fishery products at a factory located in the Chungcheongnam-siJ in Chungcheongnam-si, and Defendant A is the representative of E Co., Ltd., Defendant B served as the production management deputy head from October 2006 to June 2016. Defendant C is a person who served as a director at the above company from around 1999 to April 2016. Defendant D is a person who served as the head of the above company from May 2013 to the present date.

1. Business operators and employees of Defendant A, B, C, and D, etc., who manufacture food for common crimes, shall subdivide, transport or store products, foods, or raw materials thereof, the distribution deadline of which expires for cooking and selling, or sell such products, foods, or raw materials thereof, or use them for public use;

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired in successive collusion to keep approximately 10 tons of domestic raw materials for freezing 2 and 00 tons of Chinese raw materials in the freezing warehouse of the Cheongju Factory, Co., Ltd. for which the distribution period has elapsed, and attempted to produce and sell products using the above raw materials for the purpose of cost reduction, from January 2016, when the orders from the Customer for the canning 2 Section 2 were entered.

Accordingly, Defendant A and Defendant C ordered each of the above Defendant B to produce and sell the instant refluence forest as the above raw material. Defendant B instructed the production process to the factory employees. Defendant D, from March 2016 to May 201 of the same year, managed and supervised the production process with the above Defendant B, to 34,752 cans and cans of the instant refluence 34,752 cans and the instant cans of the instant refluence 4,872 cans of the instant refluence with yellowdo using 8,760 kilograms as raw material of Section 2, and from around that time to October 12, 2016, to 31,680 cans of the refluence that were manufactured in sequence as above, and sold to the business parties and employees of the refluence 7,080 cans among the refluences of the instant subflus, and kept them for sale in the storage for the remainder of 31,680.

Accordingly, the Defendants are the defendants.