logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.05.08 2014가단230692
소유권말소등기
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. There is no dispute between the parties to the basic facts, or comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence 1-1, 2, and 2, as to the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter "the real estate in this case"), which was owned by the plaintiff as the plaintiff's son, as the plaintiff's son, and on the other hand, as to the real estate listed in the separate sheet ("the real estate in this case"), the Busan District Court's Busan District Court's registration office on October 1, 2003 (hereinafter "the registration of transfer of ownership in this case"), and the registration of transfer under the defendant Eul's name ("the registration of transfer of ownership in this case") was completed on August 12, 2009 with the same registry office No. 38320 on August 12, 2009.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment are merely a document that issues a certificate of seal impression and a certificate of seal impression to C upon request of C to request that the real estate of this case be offered as security. Since C forged the plaintiff's certificate of seal impression and a certificate of seal impression delivered for the above purpose and completed the registration of ownership transfer of this case in the name of the defendant B, the registration of ownership transfer of this case is null and void, and since the registration of ownership transfer of this case becomes null and void, the registration of ownership transfer of this case is also null and void since the registration of ownership transfer of this case based on the registration of ownership transfer of this case and the registration of cancellation of the registration

The plaintiff's assertion that C forged a gift contract under the name of the plaintiff is insufficient to recognize the above assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. The plaintiff's assertion is without merit. The plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim is justified.

arrow