The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for each fraud described in paragraphs 1 through 3 of the decision of the court, and shall be described in paragraph 4 of the decision.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On May 27, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to 4 months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court, 1 year of imprisonment, and 1 year and 2 months of imprisonment, and terminated the enforcement of the sentence on April 25, 2012. On February 17, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to 2 years of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud and became final and conclusive on February 25, 2016. On September 1, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to 1 year and 2 months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Incheon District Court for fraud and became final and conclusive on November 7, 2017.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant is a person who administers the company B and C while running the company B and C.

1. On November 10, 2014, the criminal defendant against the victim D would pay the victim D the price regardless of whether he/she would supply a household, such as singcling, at the construction site in Gangnam-gu Seoul building F, to the victim D at the B office located within the Gangnam-gu Seoul building F.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price normally even if he is supplied with the household from the damaged person.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) had the victim deliver scams equivalent to KRW 1,820,000 to the Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; and (c) from that time to December 22, 2014, the Defendant provided households equivalent to KRW 45,725,000 on 11 occasions as shown in attached Table 1 for the crime committed in attached Table 1; and (d) did not pay KRW 29,520,000, and did not pay KRW 29,520,000.

2. The Defendant, at the end of November 2014, up to the victim G, posted the victim G on the “presumed estimate of I” on the H portal site “I,” thereby allowing the victim G to cover the construction work.

The author tried to acquire the construction cost by means of the proposal.

On December 22, 2014, the Defendant sent a destination to the victim G at the above B office around December 22, 2014

The term "(30 million won)" shall be ordered to execute construction works in the amount of KRW 30 million.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the facts have not been experienced by the Defendant, and the Internet at the time.