logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 영동지원 2013.07.04 2013고단39
수질및수생태계보전에관한법률위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine, 50,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A As the substantial representative of B Co., Ltd. in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon, from September 20 to September 23, 2012, Defendant A conducted operation in a manner of discharging approximately 1,700 tons of wastewater containing wastewater containing the permissible discharge quantity of water pollutants, 20,679g/liter (in the case of reporting, 40 g/liter) by using non-metallic mineral mining facilities, which are wastewater discharge facilities not reported to the Minister of Environment.

Defendant

B The actual representative of Defendant B Co., Ltd. used emission facilities without reporting the Defendant’s business as described in paragraph (1) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Control reports on wastewater discharge facilities without permission;

1. Results of water quality testing;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on field photographing photographs;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 76 subparag. 1-2 and Article 33(1) of the Water Quality and Ecosystem Conservation Act; selection of fines

(b) Defendant B: Articles 81, 76 subparag. 1-2, and 33(1) of the Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem Conservation Act;

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above, each of the provisional payment orders;

arrow