All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not indicate false facts, nor did the Defendants intend to impair the honor of the victim.

The Defendants’ act does not constitute an unlawful act under Article 310 of the Criminal Act or a justifiable act as an act to prevent an additional victim following the victim’s accusation (misunderstanding of legal principles).2.

가. 공소사실의 요지 피고인 A은 2016. 11. 4. 경 B와 전화통화를 하며 B가 피해자가 G을 성 추행으로 신고한 사건에 대하여 물어보자, 사실은 피해자가 어떤 목적으로 G을 신고 하였는지 아는 바가 없음에도 불구하고 B에게 “ 합의 안 하지, 합의 해 주지 말라 했다, 걔가 그게 목적인데 합의해 갖고 돈 뜯어먹을 목적인데”, “ 아 가는 원래 수법 이라니까 꽃뱀이라 니 까 H 이 친구가 감방 살다 나왔잖아,

A.L. A.L.C.;

In this month, the term “each month” was referred to.

B recorded the above mentioned contents by Defendant A, and transmitted the above recording file to Defendant C via the Kakao Stockholm Stockholm using a cell phone.

Defendant

C On November 2016, 2016, the first police officer sent the monetary recording file sent from B to NAV, a member server through mobile phone Kakao Stockholm, for the purpose of slandering the victim, even though there was no knowledge that the victim reported G for any purpose.

As a result, Defendant A has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing false facts, and Defendant C has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly disclosing false facts through information and communications networks with intent to defame the victim.

B. In full view of the relevant evidence, the lower court determined that the Defendants publicly alleged false facts, and that they intended to impair the honor of the victim by pointing out false facts.

In light of the facts charged, all of the charges of this case were convicted.

(c)

(1) the review.