logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.07.17 2014고정690
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was a person engaged in the driving of Lone Star Co., Ltd.; (b) driven the above vehicle around 09:00 on February 25, 2014, and (c) was straightened from the Central Park to the middle-speed speed of 771 Sincheon-si, Seocheon-si; (c) there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle in accordance with good faith by reducing the speed of the signal, etc. for those engaged in driving; and (d) by taking into account the transmission and the left and right and right and right and right and right and the right

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the part of the victim C's driving ahead of the passenger car in accordance with the normal left-hand turn from the upper and the right-hand turn from the middle and the right-hand turn due to the negligence in violation of the signal.

After all, the Defendant suffered, by these occupational negligence, injury to the victim C, such as damage to the parts of the side ionion, etc. on the left side, which requires approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim E, F, G, H, I, and J, each of which requires approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act.

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons above, such as the fact that the defendant is a recipient of basic living, blood marbles due to chronic renals, the defendant has no criminal record since 1978, and the victim C has not been punished against the defendant.

arrow