Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 11, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence for six months due to a violation of farmland law in the Daegu District Court and racing support, and the judgment on November 29, 2015 became final and conclusive.

On February 23, 2004, the Defendant established D Co., Ltd. (the trade name is changed from D Co., Ltd. to E on May 15, 2014; hereinafter “D”) for the purpose of manufacturing special purpose machinery, etc. (hereinafter “G representative director”) and worked in G [the trade name is changed from G to H Co., Ltd. on April 30, 2014, which is the closing date of business around April 6, 2015; March 3, 2009, when the place of business is in the race-si, while the place of business is in the race-si; around April 30, 2013, the Defendant established D Co., Ltd., Ltd. for the purpose of manufacturing gold, color, and other surface treatment steel, etc. (hereinafter “G representative director”) to work for the period from around October 20, 2014 to March 31, 2015, respectively.

1. Fraud against victims of the Korea Technology Finance Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Technology Finance Corporation”);

A. On February 27, 2012, the Defendant acquired the guarantee of self-driving funds, and applied for the technical guarantee of the victim reporter’s reporting at the point of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of the South-gu, Seoul, and the employee in charge “to obtain 500,000,000 won necessary for the purchase of raw materials related to G operation from the national bank of the national bank, to guarantee the repayment of the loan.”

However, even if the Defendant received a guarantee from the victim's reporter, the Defendant did not think that the loan was used as the operation fund of the Plaintiff separately operated by the Defendant, but made a false statement on the purpose of the loan.

The defendant deceivings employees in charge as above and then issued a credit guarantee certificate in the name of the victim in the name of the victim whose guarantee amount is 450,000,000 won under the pretext of working capital related to the general loan of a company around February 27, 2012 from the victim's report.