Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of the DNA telecom in Gangwon-gun C, and is the managing body of the passenger dog established in the DoMocom.

The managing body of the boarding machine shall undergo an inspection conducted by the head of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security for the relevant elevator, and the elevator which has failed to pass the inspection shall not be operated, and in order to operate it again, it shall undergo the inspection again.

1. On May 10, 2016, the Defendant, who failed to pass a regular inspection of an elevator (for passengers, 13 passengers) installed in Delel C located in Gangwon-gun, Gangwon-do, and operated an elevator on the 18th day of the same month, without undergoing a regular inspection, even though he/she was notified of an order to suspend operation and a re-inspection.

The Defendant, including this, operated the said elevator without undergoing a regular inspection for the operation of the elevator again between around that time and around August 2017.

2. The Defendant violated an order to suspend the operation of an elevator that has failed to pass as referred to in the foregoing A (A) by not complying with the order to suspend the operation and re-inspection, even after being notified of the order to suspend operation and re-inspection on three occasions by the competent authority (on May 17, 2016; November 30, 2016; April 26, 2017), on August 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. An investigation report (operation hours of an elevator and submission, etc. of inspection results);

1. Each inspection result;

1. A written accusation;

1. Notification of elevator inspection failure;

1. Order to suspend the operation of the disqualified elevator and notification of reinspection;

1. A special inspection report on each elevator;

1. Elevator photographs in illegal operation;

1. Response to a request for review of elevator inspection standards;

1. Orders to suspend the operation of an elevator and reexamination thereof;

1. Notification of the suspension and reinspection of failure elevators;

1. Investigative Report (Defendant G telephone conversations), the Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the crime is not constituted due to the change of the purpose of the instant building.