logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.11.26 2020노2847
사기등
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that each sentence (one year and four months of imprisonment, and ten months of imprisonment) declared by the court below to the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. All the facts charged in the instant case are recognized by the Defendants, and they are against their mistakes, and in the case of Defendant A, the fact that the Defendants agreed with the victim J of the 2020 Godan1419 case and the victim J of the 2020 Godan1537 case among the cases of Defendant A and the victim company of the Embezzlement.

However, the defendants conspired to commit the crime of this case, such as receiving mobile phone fees, receiving insurance proceeds from the victim company, and refusing to return the leased vehicle in the process, etc. Even though there was a record of criminal punishment several times due to the same veterinary act, Defendant A had already been punished several times due to the crime of fraud in the same veterinary act, Defendant A did not have to commit the Internet goods fraud against many victims. Defendant A did not have been punished from the victims of insurance fraud in the case of 2020 Godan1537, the crime of insurance fraud in the case of 2020 Godandan1536, 2238, 2411, each of the above crimes was committed during the period of repeated crime; Defendant B did not receive a letter from the victims or take any measures to recover from damage; Defendant B did not have a number of criminal records including the sentence imposed on the victims; Defendant A had no other criminal records including the age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions in the case of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow