logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.06.14 2016고단1075
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2012, the Defendant forged a private document by entering the B’s address, resident registration number, and telephone number in the lessee column of the site for the pre-sale contract for apartment, using a computer in the lessee column of the site for the pre-sale contract for apartment, and obtaining a copy of the paper for the pre-sale contract for apartment, which was forged by means of affixing the B’s seal prepared in advance on the next side, by using a type of a type of paper for the pre-sale contract for apartment. The Defendant forged a copy of the pre-sale contract for apartment by stating the personal information of the Defendant and the name of the Defendant in the lessor column of the said site and affixing the Defendant’s seal affixed thereon.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the above name in order to exercise the right and duty, forged one chapter of the whole apartment lease contract in the name of B.

2. On August 3, 2012, the Defendant: (a) presented to D and E a copy of the apartment lease contract under the above forged B’s name at the joint law office located in the front of the Busan Geum-gu Office; and (b) presented it to D and E, as such, as if the contract was duly formed.

3. Fraud: (a) on August 2, 2012, the Defendant calls to the victim D who operates a loan business at a non-permanent location and lends an apartment house to the victim D, which “it has been owned by the Defendant, as collateral, KRW 25 million. There was no bank or any other mortgage, and the deposit was 10 million won.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the deposit for the lease of the above apartment was not KRW 10 million but KRW 44 million, and the defendant was thought to borrow money from the beginning by deceiving the victim.

On the other hand, as of August 3, 2012, the Defendant presented to the victim D and the victim E a written lease agreement with a deposit of KRW 10 million. On the other hand, as of August 3, 2012, the Defendant offered to the victim D and the victim E a total of KRW 25 million from the victim D and KRW 15 million from E.

arrow