logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.15 2016고단8113
대기환경보전법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Air Quality Conservation Act is a person who operates “E” as a manufacturer of furniture products in the wife population D, and on August 12, 2015, the Defendant carried out painting work using painting facilities and one 10-year compresseds, without filing a report on the installation of air emission facilities at the said workplace, and implemented an order to close down the environment as of August 20, 2015.

Nevertheless, from November 2015 to October 28, 2016, the Defendant, at the same place of business, installed a seal building (building: volume: approximately 34 cubic meters, approximately 7.5 KW pressers) which is an unreported discharge facility at the same place of business.

2. He/she shall not construct or install any building or other facilities, or alter the purpose thereof, in violation of restrictions on the use, type, size, etc. of a building or other facilities in an area or district for use under Article 76 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act in violation of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act;

The Defendant, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1), was unable to operate a furniture product manufacturer as a natural green area, and even though he was unable to install a atmosphere emission facility, the Defendant installed a seal facility, which is an air pollutants emission facility, and operated a furniture product manufacturer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Reporting, etc. on the results of confirming the implementation of administrative dispositions;

1. Investigation reports (transmission of data verifying the ground items, etc.), land use plans, and the Ordinance on Urban Planning in Chicago-si;

1. The response to review opinions and the application of examination opinions concerning the closure order of an environment-violation company within each jurisdiction;

1. Article 90 subparagraph 1 of the Act on the Conservation of Air Quality and Articles 23 (1) (including the installation and operation of emission facilities without filing a report) concerning criminal facts, Article 141 subparagraph 4 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, and Article 76 (1) (in violation of restrictions on areas for use) of the same Act;

arrow